Free Employer Branding Brief Templates

Two research-grade briefing templates for employer brand practitioners. Template A frames your EVP research. Template B commissions your campaign. Both free, both built to raise the standard of the brief.

These templates were built in partnership with Fathom, an employer branding agency that builds EVPs from evidence rather than assumptions. Fathom's methodology centres on closing the Credibility Gap, the distance between what an organisation promises candidates and what employees actually experience. If your brief reveals more complexity than you expected, Fathom can take it from there.

Free Employer Branding Brief Templates | EVP Brief and Creative Campaign Brief | EBN x Fathom
Template A, Pre-Research, EVP

The EVP
Brief

Complete this before any EVP engagement begins. This is not the activation brief, that comes later. This document frames the research, defines the problem, and ensures the EVP that gets built is the one that is actually needed.

The Business Context

Why are we here, and why now?

A.1.1

What triggered this EVP engagement?

A specific event, data point, or business pressure that made this a priority now, not eventually.

Fathom Pro Tip "A senior leader said we should" is not a trigger. Push for the real business problem hiding behind the request. The brief is only as strong as the problem it defines.
A.1.2

Where is the business headed in the next 2 to 3 years?

Growth plans, market expansion, headcount targets, M and A activity. An EVP must serve the future organisation, not just the current one.

A.1.3

Who owns this? Who signs it off?

The day-to-day lead and the executive who will approve the final EVP. Both must be confirmed at the start, or the project stalls at review.

The Hiring Challenge

The commercial problem the EVP must solve

A.2.1

If this EVP solves only one problem, what must it be?

This is the North Star. Everything the EVP says, and does not say, is filtered through this single outcome.

A.2.2

Where is the pain sharpest right now?

Specific roles, geographies, or candidate segments where the current brand, or absence of one, is actively failing.

A.2.3

What do candidates currently believe about this organisation?

Hypothesis only. Research will test it. The gap between this answer and reality is often where the EVP opportunity lives.

Fathom Pro Tip If there is no clear answer here, that itself is a finding. An organisation that does not know what candidates think has a perception gap by default.

Priority Talent Segments

Who must this EVP work hardest for?

A.3.1

Identify your top three priority segments.

Volume roles need broad reach. Niche roles need high persuasion. Early talent requires precise timing. Each needs different emphasis in the EVP.

Fathom Pro Tip An EVP that tries to speak to everyone compels no one. Segment clarity is how you avoid producing something perfectly acceptable and entirely forgettable.
Priority 1, Volume Roles
Priority 2, Niche or Hard-to-Fill Roles
Priority 3, Early Talent (if applicable)
A.3.2

Geographic priorities

Where must the EVP work? Challenged markets need different proof points to growth markets.

The Credibility Gap

The distance between the promise and the people's reality

A.4.1

What do you want employees to say about working here?

The aspiration. What you believe, or want to believe, is genuinely true.

A.4.2

What do employees actually say, including the uncomfortable parts?

Glassdoor themes, exit interview patterns, informal feedback. The Credibility Gap lives between this answer and the one above.

Red Flag If the honest answer is "we do not know," that is itself the Credibility Gap in action. Research will surface it. If you already know, say it now. Surprises mid-project cost everyone time.
A.4.3

What are you not willing or able to fix before activating the EVP?

Knowing what is off the table means the EVP will not promise things that cannot be delivered.

Fathom Pro Tip An EVP that outruns lived reality accelerates attrition among the people you already have. The promise must be earnable before it is advertised.

Competitive Landscape

Who are you competing with for talent, not customers

A.5.1

Who are your talent competitors?

Often different from business competitors. These are the companies your candidates also interview with, or leave to join.

Fathom Pro Tip A Glassdoor signal scan and competitor claims audit against these organisations is a smart early step. It surfaces what they are promising, and where there is genuine white space to differentiate.
A.5.2

What do your competitors claim in their employer brand?

What are they saying that sounds like what you would also like to say? Where might you be heading into crowded territory?

Research Access

What is available to work with?

A.6.1

Leadership access

Senior interviews are essential. Surveys show patterns. Leaders explain context. An EVP without leadership input tends to be accurate but not strategic.

A.6.2

Employee research access

What can be run with employees? Each method adds a different layer: quantitative baseline, qualitative depth, or strategic validation.

An internal champion who can manage research distribution and scheduling is needed for employee research to run effectively.
A.6.3

External research

Survey the external talent market, or work from internal data plus market signals? This affects cost and the defensibility of the final EVP.

The Anti-Goal

What must we never say, claim, or be?

A.7.1

What is off-limits?

Brand guardrails, sensitive claims, legal constraints, or anything that would embarrass leadership if it appeared in a campaign.

Fathom Pro Tip Common examples: Do not imply the business is remote-first. Do not reference pay, it is a known weakness. Legal prohibits collecting diversity data in this market. The Anti-Goal often reveals as much as the objective does.
A.7.2

What cliches must be avoided?

The phrases that make every candidate roll their eyes, because every competitor already uses them.

Logistics and Governance

The practical constraints that kill projects if left undefined

A.8.1

Budget range

A range is fine. This shapes the methodology. Honesty here avoids three weeks of scoping only to discover the numbers do not align.

Budget Reality Check Research-led EVP work requires meaningful investment in both discovery and delivery. The methodology must match the budget, not the other way round.
A.8.2

Timeline

Ideal completion date and any hard constraints, such as a major hiring push, company announcement, or board presentation.

A.8.3

What does done look like?

The specific deliverables expected, and how success will be measured internally when the EVP is presented.

Template B, Post-EVP, Creative and Campaign

The Creative
Campaign Brief

Complete this when commissioning awareness campaigns, recruitment marketing, or both. This brief requires an EVP to exist. Without one, you are activating without a foundation, and the results will reflect that.

The Strategic Foundation

What are we activating, and at what altitude?

B.1.1

Which EVP is this campaign activating?

Link to the EVP document or playbook. If no EVP exists, this brief cannot be completed in good faith.

Prerequisite Check A campaign without an EVP is just noise with a media budget behind it. If the EVP does not exist yet, start there.
B.1.2

Ambition Level

This determines the scale, production requirements, and budget expectations. Bigger ambition requires proportionally bigger investment to match it.

Budget Check If Transformational is selected, the budget in B.8.1 must support it.
B.1.3

Balance of Power

Where does the primary weight go, internal activation or external reach? 100% external with no internal work consistently leads to attrition. Employees who do not recognise the EVP undermine it at every candidate touchpoint.

100% InternalBalanced100% External

The One Thing

SMIT, Single Most Important Thing

B.2.1

If this campaign achieves only one thing, what must it be?

Not a list of hoped-for outcomes. One thing. Every creative decision is evaluated against this. If the answer is a list, the brief is not ready.

B.2.2

North Star KPI

How will success be measured? Define the metric before briefing the creative, not after reviewing the results.

Audience

Precision over averages, the average candidate does not exist

B.3.1

Primary audience for this campaign

Specific role(s), career stage, and geography. A brief that says "everyone" briefs for no one.

B.3.2

What does this audience currently believe?

The starting point in their heads. The campaign needs to shift, or confirm, this belief.

B.3.3

Think. Feel. Do.

Three distinct outcomes from a single campaign exposure. Keep them honest, not aspirational to the point of meaninglessness.

Commercial Reality

The hiring data that shapes channel selection and media spend

B.3b.1

Total Hiring Quota, next 12 months

Quarterly breakdown determines whether this needs an Always-On media layer or Burst campaigns timed to hiring peaks.

B.3b.2

Priority Segments, hiring breakdown

Volume roles need high-reach channels. Niche roles need high-persuasion content. Each segment may need a different creative emphasis and channel mix.

Fathom Pro Tip Talent competitors are often different from business competitors. The companies your candidates also interview with, or leave to join, are the ones to benchmark creative against.
Volume Roles, high applicant flow needed
Niche or Hard-to-Fill Roles, high persuasion needed
Early Talent, if applicable
B.3b.3

Geographic Focus

Growth markets and challenged markets have different needs. Do not apply the same message and budget allocation uniformly.

B.3b.4

Talent Competitors

Who are you losing candidates to at final stage? Often different from commercial competitors.

Key Messages

Which EVP pillars lead? What proof must land?

B.4.1

Which EVP pillar(s) should lead?

Reference the pillar names from the EVP document. If all pillars are equally important, that is a flag. Dial up what matters most to this specific audience and objective.

B.4.2

What specific proof points must land?

Real, concrete evidence from the EVP proof library. Claims without proof are just marketing. Proof without claims is just data.

B.4.3

The Anti-Goal

What must this campaign never say, look like, or imply? Include anything that misrepresents the experience or that leadership would not stand behind.

Creative Direction

Style, tone, look and feel

B.5.1

Style and Tone

Describe the emotional register, not just the visual style. How should it feel to someone seeing it for the first time?

B.5.2

Visual references and benchmarks

Films, campaigns, brands. Anything pointing toward what right looks and feels like. At least one example of what to aim for, and one to avoid.

B.5.3

Music and Audio direction

For video deliverables. Reference specific tracks, energy levels, or sonic personality. Do not leave this undefined, it shapes the entire feel of the edit.

B.5.4

Creative Readiness, what assets exist today?

If nothing exists, Phase 1 of the campaign must include asset production. Do not skip this step and expect stock photography to fill the gap.

Fathom Pro Tip No asset library is actually an opportunity. Building a visual system from scratch means it can be designed entirely for the EVP, not retrofitted around whatever already exists.

Deliverables

What are we actually making?

DeliverableFormat or SpecPriority
For 9x16 video: confirm the asset works across TikTok, Reels, Stories, and Snapchat. Keep critical content out of the bottom 20% and top 10% of frame. Text safe zones apply.

Channel and Distribution

Paid, owned, earned, and can we track it?

B.7.1

Paid channels in scope

Volume roles need reach. Niche roles need precision. Do not force the same channel mix onto both.

B.7.2

Tech stack, can we track what we generate?

No tracking pixels means no ROI reporting. Surface this now, not after launch.

Fathom Pro Tip If pixel placement is not possible, resolve this before committing any paid media budget. You cannot optimise what you cannot measure.
B.7.3

Call to Action

Logistics and Governance

The constraints that kill campaigns if left undefined

B.8.1

Activation budget

Production plus media if applicable. Must match the Ambition Level selected in Section 01.

Budget Reality Check Unrealistic budgets rarely get challenged until it is too late. A campaign built on a Foundational budget against Transformational ambition delivers neither. It just disappoints everyone and erodes belief in the discipline.
B.8.2

Approvals and compliance

Who signs off on creative? Are there legal or regulatory constraints that must be understood before the creative process begins?

B.8.3

Timeline

B.8.4

Mandatory inclusions

Brand assets, legal disclaimers, accreditation marks, or anything that must appear regardless of creative direction.

Employer Branding Fundamentals

Everything you need
to know about
the brief

A brief is not a formality. It is the document that determines whether the work that follows is strategically grounded or expensively approximate. These questions cover the concepts, frameworks, and decisions that separate a brief worth acting on from one that wastes everyone's time.

Published by Employer Branding News in partnership with Fathom.

What is an employer branding brief?
An employer branding brief is a structured document that defines the scope, objective, audience, and constraints for employer brand work before any creative or research begins. There are two distinct types: an EVP brief, used before developing an Employee Value Proposition, and a creative campaign brief, used after the EVP exists to commission awareness or recruitment marketing campaigns. A brief without a clear Single Most Important Thing is not a brief. It is a list of wishes.
What is the Credibility Gap in employer branding?
The Credibility Gap is the distance between what an organisation aspires for employees to say about working there and what employees actually say. It is the foundational concept in evidence-based EVP development. An EVP that ignores it and simply amplifies aspiration does not attract better candidates. It accelerates attrition among existing employees who do not recognise the promises being made externally. Closing this gap is the primary purpose of rigorous EVP research.
What is the difference between an EVP brief and a creative campaign brief?
An EVP brief (Template A) is a pre-research document completed before any employer brand development begins. It frames the research methodology and defines the business problem the EVP must solve. A creative campaign brief (Template B) is used after the EVP already exists, to commission the activation work including awareness campaigns and recruitment marketing. A campaign brief requires an EVP. Briefing creative work without one produces campaigns that are strategically ungrounded and impossible to evaluate.
What should an EVP brief include?
A complete EVP brief should cover: the specific business trigger for the engagement, the Single Most Important Thing the EVP must achieve, priority talent segments by volume, niche, and early talent with geographic focus, a Credibility Gap assessment, the competitive talent landscape, available research access, the Anti-Goal defining what the EVP must never claim, and governance details including budget range, timeline, sign-off authority, and deliverables. Template A above covers all of these systematically.
What is the Anti-Goal in a brief?
The Anti-Goal is an explicit statement of what the EVP or campaign must never say, claim, imply, or look like. It is as strategically important as the objective. Common examples: do not imply flexible or remote working if it is not genuinely available, do not reference pay where compensation is a known weakness, do not reproduce the corporate parent brand identity. The Anti-Goal also covers clichés — "family", "fast-paced", "purpose-driven" — that appear in every competitor's messaging and differentiate no one.
What is the SMIT and why does it matter?
SMIT stands for Single Most Important Thing. It is the one outcome that the EVP or campaign must achieve above all others. Every creative decision, channel selection, and media allocation should be evaluated against it. If a brief lists five equally important objectives, it has no SMIT and the work cannot be evaluated. Common SMITs include: lower cost-per-hire in a specific market, increased application quality for a role family, shifted candidate perception in a talent market where the brand is unknown, or improved internal eNPS among a key segment.
What is Balance of Power in employer brand activation?
Balance of Power refers to the strategic split between internal employee activation and external candidate attraction in an employer brand campaign. A 100% external approach with no internal work consistently leads to higher attrition, because employees who do not recognise the EVP being promoted externally actively undermine it at every candidate touchpoint — in interviews, on Glassdoor, and in informal networks. Most effective campaigns allocate meaningful budget to internal engagement before or alongside external reach.
What are talent segments and why do they matter?
A talent segment is a distinct group of target candidates with shared characteristics, motivations, and channel behaviours. Effective employer branding identifies three primary types: volume roles requiring high applicant flow at scale, niche or hard-to-fill roles requiring high-persuasion targeted content to a specialist audience, and early talent requiring timing aligned to academic calendars. Each segment needs different creative emphasis, different channel mix, and different EVP proof points. An EVP that tries to speak to everyone compels no one.
What is the difference between Foundational, Strategic, and Transformational employer brand ambition?
Foundational addresses consistency and hygiene: job description rewrites, social playbooks, careers page copy. Strategic supports specific hiring targets in priority markets with a campaign platform and focused channel mix. Transformational is a total reset of external market position, involving a Big Bang launch, Always-On media layer, multi-market localisation, and full asset production. Budget must match ambition level. Transformational ambition on a Foundational budget produces neither outcome — it just disappoints everyone and erodes belief in the discipline.
How do I brief an employer brand agency effectively?
Complete a structured brief before any agency conversation. The brief should cover the business trigger, target talent segments with geography, the Credibility Gap, competitor landscape, research access, Anti-Goal, and budget range. Share it before requesting a proposal or scoping call. Agencies that receive a well-structured brief produce more accurate proposals, more relevant creative, and more defensible pricing. Agencies that receive vague briefs produce generic responses. The quality of the output is largely determined by the quality of the brief you provide.

Employer Branding Glossary | EBN Wiki
A clear, human glossary for employer branding, EVP, culture, recruitment marketing and HR. Use it to align teams on definitions, find the right term fast and stay current with the language talent actually uses.