Have the good times in the tech sector come to an end? What’s driving the lay-offs, when will they end, and what will the impact be?

Layoffs in the tech sector have become increasingly common since the end of the pandemic, even as companies report solid financial results. With no clear end in site, this paradox has raised questions about why these cuts are happening when many of the tech firms laying off their staff are still comfortably profitable. While there doesn’t seem to be any one single reason, a combination of cost optimization, strategic shifts, and anticipation of an economic downturn look to be the main drivers of this ugly trend.

Cost Optimization and Efficiency

Possibly the leading reason for the continued tech layoffs has been a strong focus on cost-cutting in the name of operational efficiency. This is especially true of companies that saw accelerated growth during the pandemic and now face the reality of recalibrating their bloated workforces. In 2021, tech companies were hiring aggressively to meet the surge in demand for digital services, resulting in a somewhat scarce pool of tech talent being showered in love and money. However, as economic uncertainty took centre stage, the party ended and many tech companies shifted their focus to protecting margins. Sundar Pichai, CEO of Google, commented during one such round of layoffs, explaining that "We hired for a different economic reality than the one we face today." In other words, companies are adjusting headcount to optimize for future financial stability.

Likewise, when Meta laid off thousands of employees in late 2022 and early 2023, CEO Mark Zuckerberg called it a "year of efficiency." Another move that many analysts believe was driven by a desire to streamline operations and appease investors.

Macroeconomic Uncertainty

Another (yet related) major factor contributing to this perfect storm is the uncertain macroeconomic environment. Despite strong financial performance, companies are still anticipating a potential recession or a downturn in consumer demand. As a result, they are making pre-emptive cuts to ensure long-term sustainability. In the ManpowerGroup Employment Outlook Survey for Q2 2024, employers globally reported a decline in hiring expectations, particularly in IT sectors, where hiring demand dropped 1% compared to the previous quarter. A small dip in isolation but a far cry from the bullish outlook in the preceding periods.

This caution can be seen across tech giants, almost like it’s contagious. Microsoft and Amazon have both slashed headcount in response to fears of economic slowdown, even though they remain highly profitable. Both firms justified their layoffs as part of wider efforts to maintain competitiveness in a cooling economy. It seemed as if nobody wanted to be left high and dry, so as soon as some of the bigger companies started making moves to layoff portions of the workforce, others were quick to follow suit.

Compounding recession fears is also the fact that the US is heading towards an election, which itself could bring about any number of changes, such as increased regulation, taxation, or fears of protectionist moves that could impact the tech sector's ability to sell and profit globally. Some have even pointed out that the mass dumping of company shares by the owners of big tech firms, and the recent open letter written by Mark Zuckerberg, as an indication that these well informed moguls know that some soft of black swan event is likely.

Strategic Realignments and Market Shifts

Tech companies are also laying off employees as part of strategic realignments. For instance, many firms are now prioritizing artificial intelligence, cloud computing, and automation while shedding parts of their workforce that don’t align with these goals. IBM CEO Arvind Krishna stated that his company's layoffs were part of a broader effort to focus on growth areas like AI and hybrid cloud solutions, where the company sees its future profitability. In fact, Krishna has announced that about 8,000 jobs at IBM will be replaced by AI and that back office and HR roles will be among the first to go.

Similarly, Intel's 2023 job cuts were explained as a shift toward resource allocation in high-priority areas, including semiconductor manufacturing, where the company plans to invest heavily in the coming years. Another space that’s seeing a boon due to the sharp rise in AI.

Fathom Talent Attraction

Fathom provides rigorous research, evidence-backed strategies, and data-driven employer branding

Learn More

Layoff Data and Trends

In 2023, more than 160,000 tech workers were laid off globally, a staggering figure compared to previous years. According to surveys and market forecasts, layoffs will continue through 2024, albeit at a slower pace. The Randstad Workmonitor 2024 report suggests that while hiring will remain cautious, companies in tech-heavy regions like the U.S. and Asia-Pacific might still face talent shortages in critical roles, largely due to a mismatch in skills and qualifications.

Investor Pressure and Stock Performance

Tech firms are also responding to pressures from jittery investors who are prioritizing profitability over growth. In some cases, stock prices have spiked after announcements of layoffs, reflecting a market that favours leaner, more efficient companies. This looks to have driven many CEOs to jump on the bandwagon and shed excess workforce even when it may appear counterintuitive from an operational standpoint.

The Future of Tech Workforces

Going forward, layoffs may become part of a longer-term trend of reshaping workforces around new technology, efficiency, and flexible work models. Companies are certainly rethinking how they deploy talent in the current climate, often opting to outsource or hire gig workers to maintain flexibility, or favour AI solutions over more hiring. Universum’s EB Now Survey highlights that 44% of APAC companies have increased their reliance on gig workers, further reducing their need for large full-time teams.

While tech layoffs might seem contradictory to the strong financial performances reported by these companies, and to these organisations' past talent-focused rhetoric, the quest for strategic efficiency spurred on by pressure from investors amid continued global economic uncertainty, has culminated in the situation we see today. This shift toward a leaner workforce looks likely to continue, with companies still recalibrating profitability, innovation, and cost control in a volatile landscape.

In the mid-long term, I expect the lasting impact of these layoffs on employers will be significant, particularly in terms of reputation and employer branding. While these cuts may help streamline operations and boost short-term profitability, they will certainly undermine talent acquisition efforts, employee morale, and organizational trust - the question is, by how much?

Employers engaged in these streamlining activities should expect to experience:

1. Erosion of Employer Trust

One of the most immediate and damaging effects of mass layoffs is the erosion of trust between employees and employers. Layoffs, particularly when executed poorly or without good justification, often create a sense of betrayal among remaining workers, who themselves will question their job security and the company’s commitment to its people.

When employees no longer feel secure, they are more likely to disengage (quiet quit) from their work or leave voluntarily. This was evident in companies like Meta and Amazon, where a significant drop in employee morale immediately after the layoffs was well noted. A lack of trust can be hard to rebuild, meaning that offending companies may face long-term challenges in restoring their internal culture.

One study showed that around a quarter of companies, many from the tech sector, initiated strict return to office mandates specifically in the hope that staff would quit voluntarily. The same study also showed that 40% of managers surveyed believed their company had to engage in layoffs precisely because not enough people left in protest due to those RTO mandates. This sort of behaviour, if true, or at least believed by the workforce, is hardly going to do the trust dynamic many favours.

2. Damaged Talent Attraction

Layoffs can also significantly damage an organization’s reputation in the talent market, particularly among the most skilled workers who often have a widest array of options. Studies often highlight the link between how companies treat their employees during difficult times and their ability to attract talent in the future. According to the Randstad Employer Brand Research 2023 Global Report, and others like it, competitive salary, job security, and work-life balance are the top drivers for talent. Layoffs, particularly those that are widespread or perceived as unjustified, will weaken a company’s attractiveness in these key areas.

This is particularly troubling for tech firms, which are the same companies who rely heavily on attracting scarce and top-tier talent in competitive fields like AI, cybersecurity, and cloud computing. A tarnished employer brand will leave companies struggling to compete, forcing them to offer higher compensation packages to attract talent, ultimately offsetting the cost savings from layoffs.

3. Negative External Perception

Beyond the reputational damage in the eyes of talent, layoffs also hurt a company’s reputation among other groups. Customers, partners, and some investors may view these organizations as unstable or in crisis, which can affect business relationships. When high-profile companies like Google or Twitter lay off employees en-masse, the media coverage often focuses on potential internal disarray, further hurting the company's public image.

4. Declining Employee Loyalty and Advocacy

Layoffs can also dampen employee loyalty and advocacy. In an era where word-of-mouth and employee advocacy are critical components of employer branding, disgruntled ex-employees can further damage a company’s reputation through negative reviews on platforms like Glassdoor or LinkedIn.

Companies may see a decline in employee Net Promoter Scores (eNPS), a key measure of employee satisfaction and willingness to recommend the company. A drop in advocacy not only affects recruiting but can also hurt customer relations, as employees play a vital role in communicating the company’s values and culture to clients and partners.

The damage here can also be long lasting. A flurry on negative reviews on a site like Glassdoor will stay there permanently, and will drag down the rating of that company. Regaining a past rating would be a very long and arduous task and may even become totally out of reach.

5. Competitor Advantage

Companies that avoid mass layoffs or handle them more empathetically are likely to benefit from their competitors' missteps. Those who maintain strong employer brands during times of turbulence will also have a significant advantage in attracting disillusioned talent from competitors. For instance, many firms were witnessed capitalizing on Meta’s layoffs by positioning themselves as more stable and employee-centric alternative, and welcoming those laid off to apply.

How Much Will Employer Brands Be Affected?

The impact of layoffs on employer brands will vary depending on how companies manage the process. Firms that prioritize transparency, provide adequate severance, and offer support like outplacement services can mitigate some reputational damage. Conversely, organizations that handle layoffs abruptly or without clear communication will face long-term harm. The following key factors will determine how severe the impact will be:

• Communication: Companies that communicate openly about the reasons for layoffs and future plans will face less damage compared to those that are opaque.
• Support for Laid-Off Employees: Offering generous severance packages, retraining opportunities, and mental health support can soften the blow and preserve the company’s reputation.
• Industry Standing: The tech industry, in particular, is highly sensitive to employer reputation, with workers often prioritizing companies with a strong brand for innovation and employee well-being. This makes layoffs particularly damaging in this sector compared to others.

Conclusion: A Delicate Balance

While some may argue that layoffs are sometimes necessary, the way companies justify them and execute them will have lasting effects on their employer brands. Those that fail to manage the process empathetically risk long-term damage to their reputation, making it harder to attract and retain top talent in the future. The ongoing talent shortage in tech compounds this issue, as companies are already facing fierce competition for skilled workers. In an industry where innovation and talent are key differentiators, the lasting impact of layoffs on employer branding could shape the competitive landscape for years to come.

Need help with your online reputation? Reach out to me and find out what you can do to protect your employer brand and online reputation.

Takeaways

Did you enjoy reading this? Elevate your employer branding game. Subscribe for more fresh content and expert insights - it's free!