Employer Branding Almanack 2025: What The Year’s Big Stories Really Told Us

In 2025 employer branding grew up. AI rewrote jobs, RTO became a reputational event, CEOs turned into brand signals, and radical honesty replaced generic “great place to work” claims. This Almanack distils 28 stories into practical rules.

By James Robbins 15 min read
Clouds and blue sky reflected in the grid of a modern glass office building facade.
2025 was the year employer brands had to look in the glass: AI, RTO and leadership choices all reflected back more clearly than any campaign.

Employer branding in 2025 stopped being a “nice storytelling function” and became a navigation system for risk: AI disruption, contested work models, and leaders whose behaviour trends faster than any campaign.

For this Almanack, we went back to the data. We took 28 of Employer Branding News’ best performing pieces of the year, selected using a mix of Google search performance and newsletter engagement (opens and clicks), then asked a simple question: what do the stories people actually read and share tell us about where employer branding is heading?

SPONSORED
CTA Image

Helping HR, talent acquisition, employer branding, and company culture professionals find careers worth smiling about.

Find People-First Jobs Now

If you strip away the headlines, the stories point to a simple truth:

In 2025, employer branding shifted from selling jobs to explaining trade offs, as AI, new work models, and visible leadership behaviour forced organisations to show what they really value.

The big employer branding themes that defined 2025

AI and automation are rewriting jobs, recruiting, and EVP

Pieces like When Professional Work Disappears: Facing Mo Gawdat’s AI Dystopia, The End of Outlook Careers, and OpenAI’s jobs bet argue that AI is not just another tool category. It is a mirror that shows which roles actually create value and which exist mainly to move email, decks, and status reports between meetings. The research based explainers (Mercer’s 2025 Global Talent Trends, The Future of Jobs 2025: A Blueprint for Talent Attraction, Deloitte’s 2025 Human Capital Trends) put numbers and frameworks to the same idea. Jobs of tomorrow need human judgment, creativity, and relationship building, while tasks of yesterday quietly move to models and agents.

For employer branding leaders, that creates three big shifts. First, job stories have to be explicit about how AI fits into the work. Second, EVPs need to speak to reskilling, experimentation, and psychological safety around automation. Third, recruiting content has to address trust and risk, from deepfake candidates to algorithmic management rules, as seen in AI Fakers, Deepfake Candidates, and North Korean IT Workers: The Hiring Crisis No One Saw Coming and the piece on the EU’s preparation to regulate algorithmic management.

Articles like GEO for Employer Branding: Why the Next Battle for Talent Is Fought in AI Outputs push the idea further: your brand now has to show up accurately not only in search results, but in AI answers that candidates see before they ever visit your site.

Practical rules for the AI era

  • Describe the work, not the tools. Candidates assume you use AI. What they want to know is whether the role is about supervising systems, designing them, or doing what the system cannot.
  • Audit roles for “AI exposure” and tell the truth. If a job is likely to change drastically, say so and show the support you offer. Glossing over it only fuels distrust later.
  • Treat GEO as the new SEO. As argued in GEO for Employer Branding, assume that many candidates will first meet your brand through summarised AI outputs, not your careers page. Feed those models with clear, structured, and consistent content.
  • Build trust into your talent tech stack. Be explicit about how you verify candidates, how you avoid discriminatory algorithms, and how you use monitoring tools. Silence feels dangerous in a world of deepfakes and opaque scoring.

The real risk is hollow roles, not smart machines

The loudest debate in 2025 was “Will AI replace jobs or not.” The more useful question for employer brand leaders is: Which jobs are worth defending in the first place. AI is exposing roles that were under designed and over credentialed. If your EVP champions “impact” while half your workforce does work they privately describe as pointless, no amount of AI messaging will save the brand.

SPONSORED by Fathom
CTA Image

Momentum isn’t always progress, especially when you always end up back where you started.

Fathom helps you escape the loop. With insight, not intuition.

Break the Loop

Work models, flexibility, and the myth of an easy employers’ market

Articles on RTO, quiet quitting, and regional trends tell a consistent story. In Employers’ Market, Or Just Louder Noise, the supposed glut of candidates is reframed as a signal problem. Yes, more CVs land in inboxes, but many are misaligned, low intent, or generated by AI. The REAL New Normal: Quiet Quitting, Nesting, and the Rise of Workplace Apathy adds the internal side: a workforce that is not leaving en masse, but is emotionally checked out.

RTO pieces like Return to Office Mandates: The Talent Exodus CEOs Didn’t See Coming and Has PwC Just Ended the Remote Work Debate show how office policies have become brand defining events. The decision to demand three, four, or five days in office is no longer a purely operational choice. It is a public statement about how much you trust people and which kinds of lives you think are compatible with career progression.

Overlay that with regional contrasts from Employer Branding Around the World in 2025: APAC vs Europe vs USA and practical local stories like From the Inside Rail: Paul Hotchan on Hong Kong’s Vibrant Culture, Talented Community, and Local Life, and a clear pattern emerges: there is no single “future of work”, only overlapping work multiverses. The global view in 2025 Global Talent Trends: The Talent Multiverse – A Deeper Dive into the Future of Work reinforces that fragmentation at a macro level.

Practical rules for work models and talent markets

  • Stop saying “employers’ market” in the EB team. It encourages complacency. Ask instead: “Are we getting more of the right candidates, or just more noise.”
  • Treat RTO decisions as campaigns, not memos. Involve EB early in shaping the narrative, not just in editing the all staff email. Candidates will see and dissect whatever you send.
  • Design flexibility with geography in mind. What feels generous in one market may be baseline in another. Use local stories and leaders to explain why conditions differ.
  • Address apathy head on. Quiet quitting content resonated because it named what many people felt. In your own channels, show how you handle stagnation, not only growth.

Why an “employers’ market” will slow your hiring down

It is tempting to equate “frictionless” with “good” in both hiring and work design. The year’s stories suggest the opposite. When every candidate can apply in two clicks from a phone and every role is advertised as “work from anywhere”, signal quality collapses. The organisations with the healthiest talent pipelines are often those that deliberately introduce some friction: clearer expectations, realistic location requirements, and applications that require more than a button press.


Leadership is the loudest employer brand channel you have

Several hero pieces make one point from different angles: whatever you say as an employer, your leaders’ behaviour will say it louder. Nice Company. Shame About the CEO. explores what happens when a respected organisation is fronted by a leader whose public statements, treatment of staff, or crisis handling undermine trust. The Crucial Role of Your CEO’s LinkedIn Profile in Employer Branding zooms in on one very specific but powerful channel. If the CEO’s feed is a mix of generic quotes, political hot takes, or silence, it becomes part of the employer brand whether anyone planned it or not.

At the same time, pieces like Leading with Purpose: Kevin Chua on Talent, Mission, and the Future of UWCSEA and The Forgotten Lesson Of the Netflix Culture Deck show the positive side. Purpose can be credible when leaders grapple with trade offs in public. Culture documents can still matter when they are written to be used, not framed. The forgotten lesson in the Netflix deck is not “be radical”. It is “be clear about what it takes to succeed here, and accept that this will exclude some people”.

Practical rules for leadership as an employer brand asset

  • Treat leadership visibility as part of EB governance. Someone should own the question: “What do our leaders’ public profiles and behaviour say about work here.”
  • Brief, do not script. Candidates can smell ghostwritten leadership content that reads like PR. Support leaders with guardrails and themes, not canned posts.
  • Align culture artefacts with day to day decisions. If your culture deck says “freedom and responsibility” and your RTO policy says “badge in five days or else”, candidates will believe the policy.
  • Use leaders to explain trade offs, not just successes. The most credible employer brand moments in 2025 were often leaders acknowledging a tension or constraint, not launching a new benefit.

When silence beats forced “thought leadership”

There is a growing pressure for every leader to be a “thought leader” on social platforms. The Almanack stories suggest a more selective approach. In some cases, a disciplined low profile is safer than a high volume of shallow content. It is better to have one executive who posts rarely but honestly than a chorus of senior voices sharing the same bland graphic.

The EBN Dispatch Podcast | Employer Branding & Talent
The EBN Dispatch is your no-fluff podcast on employer branding, talent attraction, retention, and company culture served with dry wit and sharper-than-average insight.

Radical honesty and creative activation beat generic “great place to work”

The most memorable campaigns in the hero set are those that do not pretend work is universally delightful. "Don’t Work Here": The Employer Brand That Dares You to Look Twice leans on reverse psychology to repel the wrong people and attract those who thrive in high challenge environments. Employer Branding in the Age of Radical Honesty: Authenticity or Overexposure analyses a broader trend toward showing the hard edges of roles, from shift patterns to stakeholder politics.

Activation pieces such as Freedom Within a Framework: Rethinking Global Employer Brand Activation and Employer Branding Around the World in 2025 explore how to give local teams creative control without breaking the brand. Why Work Friendships Are the Untapped Superpower of Employer Branding shifts the spotlight from slogans to the everyday relationships that keep people from leaving. IKEA Meets the Metaverse: Assembling Careers in Roblox, One Pixel at a Time offers a playful case where careers content in Roblox is both stunt and signal: an invitation to a different kind of work experience, particularly for early career talent.

Practical rules for honesty and activation

  • Make at least one trade off explicit in every major campaign. It might be pace, expectations, travel, or ambiguity. If you cannot name any trade offs, the campaign is probably not honest enough.
  • Codify the “freedom within a framework”. Spell out which elements of your employer brand are fixed globally and where markets can flex language, imagery, and messaging.
  • Show the social fabric, not just the perks. Stories of friendships, mentorships, and local communities resonate more than generic “our people are our strength” lines.
  • Experiment where your talent spends time. For some sectors that might be Roblox or gaming platforms. For others it might be local community events or niche professional forums. The point is to test one or two non traditional channels, not chase every shiny object.

Radical honesty only works when the culture can back it

Radical honesty is fashionable, but it is not a shortcut. A “Don’t work here” billboard on top of a low trust culture and opaque pay will look like cynicism. The brands that made provocative campaigns work in 2025 did so because the internal reality, while demanding, was coherent with the external message. Start with basic truth telling before you borrow the shock tactics.


Strange but useful miscellania from a noisy year

Not every insight fits neatly into a theme. Some of the most revealing moments in the hero set came from niche stories and odd angles that punched above their weight.

Oddly specific talent problems that say a lot

  • Deepfake contractors and North Korean IT workers
    The AI Fakers, Deepfake Candidates, and North Korean IT Workers piece shows that security, compliance, and brand are converging. Employers are now dealing with candidates who may not be who they claim to be, or who may be working for sanctioned regimes. That is not just a legal issue. It changes how safe current employees feel about your hiring standards.
  • Metaverse store shifts in Roblox
    The IKEA Meets the Metaverse story might look like a gimmick, yet it taps into a serious question: how do you show frontline and retail work in channels that feel native to younger candidates.
  • City as part of the EVP
    From the Inside Rail: Paul Hotchan on Hong Kong’s Vibrant Culture, Talented Community, and Local Life reminds us that for globally mobile talent, the city is part of the employer brand. Schools, transport, housing, and community networks all shape whether a role feels doable.
  • Teachers balancing mission and reality
    Leading with Purpose: Kevin Chua on Talent, Mission, and the Future of UWCSEA highlights a group often left out of corporate EB: educators who care deeply about purpose but still face burnout, pay constraints, and complex stakeholder expectations.

Absolutely, that fits the Almanack vibe nicely. Here is a self-contained subsection you can drop straight into the “Strange but useful miscellania” section, replacing or extending the existing buzzword bit.

SPONSORED
CTA Image

Helping HR, talent acquisition, employer branding, and company culture professionals find careers worth smiling about.

Find People-First Jobs Now

The buzzword bingo card

Across the 28 hero articles that rose to the top on Google search and newsletter engagement, a familiar cast of phrases kept turning up. The interesting part is not that they appear, but that they keep winning clicks and opens. Here is the unofficial 2025 buzzword bingo card.

Buzzword Bingo: 2025 Employer Branding Edition
Mark a square every time one of these shows up in your decks, emails, all hands, or leadership speeches this quarter.
“Future of work” “Talent trends” “Employer
branding trends”
“Jobs of tomorrow” “Future of recruiting”
“Flexible” “Hybrid” “Purpose” “Mission” “Culture & values”
“War for talent” “Innovation” FREE SPACE
“AI” & “layoffs”
“Disruption” “Ecosystem”
“Holistic” Job hugging Career cushioning Coffee badging Quiet quitting
Rage applying Ghosting Talent multiverse Talent exodus Workplace apathy
Honourable mentions and new micro genres
Also listen out for:
Leveraging, quiet firing, nesting, resenteeism, rage quitting,
AI fakers and deepfakes, AI pocalypse, doomcasting, carewashing,
algorithmic management, GEO,
and house favourites Paper Cut, EBN Dispatch.

If these show up alongside your bingo squares, you are probably writing for people who know exactly what all of them feel like.

What employer branding leaders should double down on next year

Invest more in…

  • Job and work design storytelling. Move beyond culture and benefits to explaining how roles are changing with AI, what stays human, and what progression really looks like.
  • Leadership readiness for visibility. Train and support CEOs and senior leaders to show up online and in public in ways that match your EVP rather than drift from it, drawing on lessons from Nice Company. Shame About the CEO. and The Crucial Role of Your CEO’s LinkedIn Profile in Employer Branding.
  • Global to local EB frameworks. Build practical playbooks that let markets adapt messaging while keeping core promises stable, as argued in Freedom Within a Framework: Rethinking Global Employer Brand Activation.
  • Trust and safety narratives. Make clear statements about how you use AI, how you protect against fraud, and how you respond when things go wrong.

Experiment with…

  • Radically honest micro campaigns. Test smaller “truth telling” experiments around specific teams or roles before going organisation wide, inspired by Don’t Work Here and Employer Branding in the Age of Radical Honesty.
  • New surfaces and AI answer engines. Pilot content specifically designed for GEO: structured FAQs, leadership Q&A, and clear descriptions of policies that AI systems can easily summarise.
  • Social fabric storytelling. Try formats that highlight work friendships, peer communities, and local life: podcasts, short videos, or written profiles that feel specific rather than generic.
  • Hybrid work “explainers” as content assets. Instead of one email on RTO, create reusable content that explains your philosophy and how it plays out in different roles and regions.

Retire or rethink…

  • “We are like a family” messaging. In a year of quiet quitting and RTO backlash, this line mostly signals boundary issues. Replace it with more precise descriptions of support and expectations.
  • Over indexing on volume metrics. Stop celebrating application numbers and vanity traffic without asking if you are attracting the right people.
  • One size fits all flexibility promises. Candidates now know that “flexible” can mean anything from fully remote to “you can leave early on Fridays if your manager agrees”. Spell it out or do not say it.
  • Silent AI adoption. Adopting AI tools without any external narrative leaves a vacuum that others will fill with fear and speculation.

Closing reflection – employer branding as a practice of choices

Taken together, the 28 hero stories of 2025 show employer branding maturing into something more demanding and more useful. It is less about inventing a narrative and more about curating and explaining the consequences of choices: which jobs to redesign or protect, which work models to back, which leaders to amplify, and which truths to tell out loud.

There is no neutral ground anymore. A quiet CEO, a vague AI policy, or a shrug on RTO is still a signal. Competitors, candidates, employees, regulators, and AI systems are all reading those signals at once. The organisations that will still be attractive five years from now are less likely to be the ones with the slickest campaigns, and more likely to be the ones whose campaigns, policies, and lived experience line up.

If you are short on time, pick one theme from this Almanack and design a small, concrete experiment for the next quarter. Audit one family of jobs for AI exposure and rewrite the stories. Rewrite your RTO explainer as if it were a career page. Brief your CEO for one honest post about a real trade off. Or pilot a radically honest micro campaign for a hard to fill role. The point is not to fix everything at once, but to start treating employer branding as the practice of telling the truth usefully.


Takeaways – what leaders are really asking about employer branding now

How should employer branding leaders respond to AI disruption?

Short answer: Treat AI as a design challenge for jobs, skills, and reputation, not just as a tool to add to your recruitment tech stack.

Longer answer: Start by mapping where AI is already changing work in your organisation, then build that reality into your narratives. Highlight how roles are evolving, which skills you value, and how you support people through change. In parallel, create clear statements on ethical AI use, candidate verification, and employee monitoring. Not every detail needs to be public, but the broad principles should be. Finally, plan for GEO: ensure that AI systems can easily find and summarise your policies, EVP, and leadership content accurately.

What is the CEO’s real role in employer branding?

Short answer: The CEO is both your biggest brand asset and your most visible risk. Their behaviour and online presence often matter more than any campaign.

Longer answer: Candidates and employees use the CEO as a shortcut for “what this place really values”. That includes public statements on social issues, crisis responses, and the tone of their LinkedIn feed. Employer branding leaders cannot control the CEO, but they can influence the environment around them. This includes briefing them on talent priorities, providing thematic content support, and aligning leadership messages with culture artefacts like internal decks. In some cases, EB leaders will also need to plan mitigation strategies for when CEO behaviour clashes with the EVP.

Does remote work still matter for talent attraction?

Short answer: Yes, but not in a binary “remote or not” way. The details of your work model and how you explain them are now a core part of your employer brand.

Longer answer: The RTO stories in 2025 show that what people react to is not just where they work, but what that says about autonomy, trust, and fairness. Full flexibility can be attractive, but it is not always practical. Fully on site can work for some roles and markets if other aspects of the deal are compelling. The key is to be precise and transparent: specify patterns by role and location, explain the reasoning, and show how you listen and adapt. Treat your work model as an evolving contract with talent, not a one time decree.

How honest is too honest in employer branding?

Short answer: You cross the line when honesty becomes self indulgent or when the external story is harsher than the internal reality. Start by matching the two.

Longer answer: Radical honesty works when it clarifies trade offs and helps candidates self select. It fails when it feels like a stunt disconnected from how the organisation behaves. Before launching a “Don’t work here” style campaign, test whether your leaders, managers, and policies support the message. You can start with softer transparency moves: realistic job previews, explicit “what you will love / what will challenge you” sections, and stories where employees describe both. Over time, you can dial up provocation if the culture can back it.

How do AI search and LLMs change employer brand strategy?

Short answer: They add a new front to the visibility battle. You are now optimising for how systems summarise you, not only how humans read you.

Longer answer: Generative systems pull from job descriptions, reviews, leadership content, news, and policy documents. If those sources are inconsistent, vague, or outdated, AI will reflect that. Employer branding leaders should work with colleagues in comms, legal, and product to ensure core statements about work, culture, pay philosophy, and flexibility are clear, up to date, and easy to parse. Think in terms of canonical answers to common questions. Over time, monitor what AI systems say about you and treat inaccuracies as reputational bugs to fix.

How can we protect our hiring from deepfake candidates and other AI fakers?

Short answer: Combine better verification processes with clear communication and ethical boundaries, so you increase trust without creating a surveillance culture.

Longer answer: The hiring crisis stories involving deepfake candidates show that traditional CV checks and casual video calls are no longer enough. Organisations can respond by tightening identity verification, using secure platforms, and training hiring teams to spot red flags. At the same time, employer branding teams should help explain these measures to candidates, framing them as part of a broader commitment to safety and fairness. If you introduce new assessments or checks, be transparent about why and how data is used. The goal is to keep both genuine candidates and existing employees confident that your bar for trust is high, but not arbitrary.