The lawsuit that says an algorithm chose Meta's layoffs

A lawsuit alleges AI, not humans, chose Meta's layoffs, and targeted staff on protected leave. VW's cuts are now confirmed at 50,000. Welcome to the forever layoff.

By EBN 12 min read
An empty office cubicle in black and white, chair pushed in and a desk phone unplugged with its cables coiled loose, symbolising a role removed by decision rather than by a person.
The desk was cleared before anyone could ask who made the call.

There's a phrase doing the rounds this week that names something a lot of HR and TA leaders have felt without a word for it: the forever layoff. Not a single brutal cut followed by recovery, but a permanent low hum of small, rolling reductions that never quite stops, even as the same companies keep hiring for AI roles and posting record productivity numbers. This week gave that phrase four separate case studies. An algorithm allegedly chose who lost their job at Meta, and allegedly targeted people who'd taken protected leave to do it. Volkswagen's threatened cuts became a confirmed number. And in offices that haven't cut anyone at all, the basic terms of employment, pay, flexibility, even how long people stay, are quietly coming apart anyway.

SPONSORED by Fathom
CTA Image

Your employees know the truth. Does your EVP? At Fathom we measure the "Credibility Gap" between your promise and their reality.

Close the Gap
  • A lawsuit alleges Meta's layoff decisions were made by AI, and allegedly targeted staff on protected medical leave
  • Volkswagen's threatened job cuts are now a confirmed 50,000, after the board rejected plant closures
  • Welcome to the "forever layoff": workers are entering an era of continuous small cuts, and some are retiring early rather than adapt
  • The employment relationship is fraying without a single redundancy: job-hugging is cracking, RTO reads as a pay cut, and Gen Z is job-scrolling on the clock

This Week’s Paper Cut's