[18 MAY] PAPER CUT

Silicon Valley doesn’t want to improve work, it wants to erase it. As AI scales and middle managers disappear, what’s left for the rest of us? This week’s Paper Cut breaks down the automation obsession, career collapse, and the silent EVP crisis it’s creating.

By James Robbins 6 min read
Two humanoid robots facing each other, hands touching, with bold text “Erase All Humans” over a vivid purple background.
Paper Cut - The most important EB headlines from the week, for subscribers only.

Welcome back to another edition of Paper Cut, your weekly slice of HR reality straight, sharp, and strategy-first.

This week, we’re not burying the lede: Silicon Valley’s latest vision for the future doesn’t include most of us.

AI is no longer just accelerating work. According to some of the industry’s loudest voices, it’s here to replace it entirely. From sweeping layoffs to whispered dinner party admissions, the plan is clear: eliminate human labour, scale the tech, and reap the salaries. All of them.

Meanwhile, the middle is vanishing, middle managers, middle income, middle ground. As mass layoffs continue, new roles are emerging, but so is a generation determined to avoid the corporate hierarchy altogether.

So if you’ve been wondering where work is going, this week’s headlines suggest an answer: away from you, unless you’re coding the future, funding it, or willing to be led by it.

This Week’s Paper Cut's


Jump to the video version of this article

AI: Eliminate as Many Humans as Possible, as Fast as Possible

We’re officially past the tipping point. AI is no longer the shiny toy for tech demos, it’s the rationale behind job cuts, restructures, and boardroom power plays.

But the most jaw-dropping take didn’t come from a company update. It came from The Guardian, where Ed Newton-Rex lays it bare: for many in Silicon Valley, AI isn’t about augmenting work, it’s about erasing the human workforce entirely.

This isn’t just about automation. It’s ideology. The emerging tech elite aren’t just aiming to improve productivity. They want to own the entire means of production, replacing labour with code, and humans with bots. As Newton-Rex puts it:

AI will do the thinking, robots will do the doing. The question is, what place do humans have in that world and do tech CEOs even care?

Meanwhile, companies like GitHub throw us a bone, programmers are still needed, for now. Amazon teases “new human jobs” in its AI-first workforce vision. Alibaba, on the other hand, isn’t hedging, it’s going all in on AI-led operations over the next 3–5 years.

💡 Employer Brand POV

This is more than a tech shift, it’s a trust test. If your company’s future-of-work vision involves AI and automation (and it does), your people need to know where they fit in. Silence isn’t strategy. It’s negligence. In a world rewriting the rules of labour, your EVP has to be a blueprint not a slogan.

For Silicon Valley, AI isn’t just about replacing some jobs. It’s about replacing all of them | Ed Newton-Rex
AI will do the thinking, robots will do the doing. What place do humans have in this arrangement – and do tech CEOs care? says Ed Newton-Rex, founder of Fairly Trained
GitHub CEO on Why We’ll Still Need Human Programmers
Thomas Dohmke foresees that anyone will be able to build software with AI, but everyone will need to maintain the software they build.
Amazon offers peek at new human jobs in an AI bot world | TechCrunch
The tech industry seems to have two thoughts when it comes to where human workers fit into the AI-powered world they are creating: Either they think that Amazon offered a hint of what new human jobs might look like in a work world dominated by AI and robots when it announced its new Vulcan robot that can “feel.”
Alibaba’s Joe Tsai: AI set to transform operations in next five years
Tsai and chief people officer Jane Jiang Fang answer questions from the staff, including the impact of the US-China trade war on the company.

📌 Sources


The Middle Cuts: Career Purgatory Gets the Axe

Middle management is disappearing. Amazon’s CEO openly questioned the need for managers who...

“want to put their fingerprints on everything”

Microsoft is cutting 3% of global jobs, and global media is buzzing about the rising trend of “middle-outs.”

The Business Times and TD Magazine both report a growing wave of layoffs targeting managers caught between operational execution and strategic vision.

💡 Employer Brand POV:

When your EVP promises “growth opportunities” but eliminates the path to leadership, you’re asking employees to stay for a future you’ve quietly removed. If you’re scrapping middle layers, you need to double down on transparent progression paths or risk a trust collapse.

🎯 Sources:


Global Layoffs, Confidence Collapses

Nissan is cutting up to 20,000 jobs globally, following a staggering $4.5 billion annual loss. Panasonic is streamlining its workforce by 10,000 roles, and Burberry is shedding 1,700 jobs in a last-ditch effort to salvage its turnaround strategy.

Why the cuts now? The latest S&P Global labour market outlook offers a clear clue: business confidence has plunged. Geopolitical uncertainty, tariff tension, and sluggish demand are making executives pull the handbrake, fast. The report highlights a marked downturn in employer sentiment, with fewer companies planning to hire, and more hedging with hiring freezes and budget-tightening layoffs.

In other words, the talent market isn’t cooling by itself, it’s being intentionally chilled by leadership decisions driven by fear, not fundamentals.

💡 Employer Brand POV:

Layoffs alone won’t kill your brand, but the way you handle them might. If your messaging is vague, your values will feel performative. Employees need clarity about what’s next, not just what’s lost. In the EVP equation, your survivors matter as much as your leavers.

📌 Sources:


Gen Z to Leadership: “Hard Pass”

Here’s a new wrinkle in the talent narrative: Gen Z isn’t gunning for your job. In fact, many are actively avoiding management roles. The reason? Mental health, lack of trust in corporate leadership, and a general rejection of hustle culture.

It’s not laziness. It’s clarity. Gen Z sees how managers are treated, especially now, and is saying, “No thanks.”

💡 Employer Brand POV:

You can’t market leadership as aspirational while making it look thankless. If the next generation is swerving management, the real question is: what made it so unattractive in the first place?

📌 Source:


Closing Thoughts

This week’s stories aren’t just signals, they’re warnings. When the people building the future say it doesn’t need people, that’s not innovation. That’s elimination.

As AI ambitions grow louder and middle managers quietly disappear, trust, clarity, and leadership become your employer brand’s only defence. Your EVP isn’t just a promise anymore. It’s a survival plan.

So, heading into the week ahead, ask yourself:

  • Have we told our people where they fit in the future of our business?
  • Are we actively designing careers or just quietly deleting them?
  • And if your EVP were tested tomorrow, would it hold up… or fall apart under scrutiny?

The future of work isn’t coming. It’s happening. Time to get specific, get human, and get real.


Video Version

🎥 Prefer to watch? Check out the video edition of Paper Cut for sharp takes on this week’s biggest trends in employer branding and HR.


The EBN Dispatch Podcast | Employer Branding & Talent
The EBN Dispatch is your no-fluff podcast on employer branding, talent attraction, retention, and company culture served with dry wit and sharper-than-average insight.