The Hidden Labour Crisis Behind Low Unemployment Rates

Here's the thing about unemployment numbers. Governments love them. Economists cite them. And right now, they look pretty good.

The OECD unemployment rate held at 4.9% throughout 2024 - broadly stable, with record lows in several member countries. In the US, the number sits around 4%. The UK, Germany, Australia - all relatively benign on paper. If you read the headline, you'd think labour markets were functioning more or less as intended.

Your employees know the truth. Does your EVP? At Fathom we measure the "Credibility Gap" between your promise and their reality.

Close the Gap

But talk to people who are actually looking for work right now, and you hear something very different. Something is broken, and the official numbers aren't showing it.

The gap between the stats and the street

The global unemployment rate stands at its lowest level since 1991. But as the World Economic Forum's Future of Jobs Report puts it, this headline figure hides a range of disparities.

The core problem is how we define "employed." A worker who picks up three days a week of freelance after losing a senior full-time role? Employed. Someone delivering food between contract job applications? Employed. A former marketing director running a Substack and doing occasional consulting to cover rent? Also employed.

On paper, these people don't exist as a problem. In reality, many of them are in career freefall.

This is underemployment - and there are no reliable statistics for it. That, in itself, is part of the crisis.

The numbers that do tell the story

Even without a clean underemployment measure, it’s not hard to pull together enough data to paint a clear picture.

In the first half of 2024, 173 million job applications were submitted - a 31% increase from the same period the year before. Meanwhile, job openings grew by just 7%. Applications were growing four times faster than positions.

Four times faster? Think about that for a moment.

Applications per hire tripled between 2021 and 2024, and remained above 300 throughout 2025. Every single hire now requires, on average, more than 300 applications. In 2021, it was closer to 100. This isn’t exactly what you’d call a tight job market. So, why is this massive shift happening at a time when official unemployment is supposedly fine?

By mid-2025, the average job opening was receiving 242 applications - three times the 2017 average, according to Greenhouse data.

Then there's the experience of searching? The average job search now spans about five months. Nearly a quarter of unemployed people (23.5%) had been out of work for 27 weeks or longer as of April 2025. In all of 2025, US employers added just 181,000 jobs, compared to the 1.46 million they added in 2024.

These are not the numbers of a healthy labour market. The Great Stay is a not an unexplainable phenomenon, it’s a rational response to how things feel on the ground. Yet governments and economists look at the unemployment numbers and talk about resilience.

The "working unemployed"

The modern underemployed worker doesn't fit the traditional image. They're not disengaged from the economy. In many cases, they're highly experienced professionals - people who've been laid off from white collar roles, left organisations during restructures, or spent months applying with little to no response, and eventually accepted fragmented or gig work to keep some income coming in.

Have something to say that you can't say on the record? It belongs in The Exit Interview.

Jump to the form

A quick scan on LinkedIn paints an eerie picture. One former corporate IT professional describes trading a six-figure salary for freelance projects and food deliveries after her contract role ended. An executive communications professional who had two competing offers in 2022 says he now feels "completely ignored." A paralegal who lost his job in August 2024 exhausted his unemployment benefits and eventually moved cities to live with family.

These aren't just fringe cases. What we're now seeing in an exploding category of people technically active in the economy, but unable to regain the level of stable employment they previously held. And they're statistically invisible.

The gig economy surge, is it flexibility or survival?

The number of full-time independent workers in the US more than doubled — from 13.6 million in 2020 to 27.7 million in 2024, representing 16.7% of the entire US workforce. And the story is similar in many other developed markets.

The number of Americans freelancing grew by 90%!!! between 2020 and 2024. By 2027, projections suggest over 86.5 million people will be freelancing in the US –that's more than half the total labour force!!!

Some of this is genuine choice. Many independent workers genuinely prefer the autonomy. But a significant portion of this growth is people making the best of bad options. Following layoffs in 2023 and 2024, 69% of employers hired freelancers to fill the specialised gaps left by full-time staff - which tells you exactly what's happening. Organisations cut permanent roles, then quietly backfill with contractors. The work still needs to get done. It just doesn't come with benefits, security, or a career path.

Helping HR, talent acquisition, employer branding, and company culture professionals find careers worth smiling about.

Find People-First Jobs Now

Around 66% of freelancers say they find it challenging to get enough work, and 44% of those who depend on freelancing as their main income report high levels of economic anxiety. So, for many this is a lot less about flexibility and a lot more about survival and coping.

AI and white-collar disruption are accelerating the problem

Underemployment has long existed in hospitality, retail, and seasonal industries. What's different now is the growing exposure of professional and knowledge workers.

According to US Bureau of Labor Statistics projections, occupations like cashiers, office assistants, and customer service representatives are expected to lose hundreds of thousands of roles between 2024 and 2034. Clerical typists face a projected 36% decline, phone operators 27.5%, and data entry roles 25.9%.

It's no longer just low-skill roles disappearing. The pattern is moving further and further up the professional ladder. Marketing, recruiting, operations, customer support, admin functions - all are being reshaped by AI-driven efficiency expectations. Companies still need work done but they're increasingly reluctant to commit to permanent headcount to do it.

Contracting, gig work, and project-based hiring become the work around. For employers, it's justified and sold as low risk and flexible. For workers, it often looks like instability dressed up as opportunity.

Why this matters economically - even when the headline numbers look fine

A labour market doesn't need catastrophic unemployment to create serious economic strain. Widespread insecurity can do just as much damage and do it quietly. And that's what's happening here.

Workers in precarious situations - piecing together contract work, worried about next month's income - will pull back. They’ll spend less. They delay buying homes or making purchases. They postpone major life decisions – marriage, kids. They avoid long-term financial commitments. The knock-on effects run through housing, retail, hospitality, education, and investment.

The concern isn't that AI will take everyone's job. It only needs to destabilise 10-20% of the workforce for the societal impact to be significant. And we may already be past that threshold in certain professional sectors.

Underemployment creates what you might call a slow-burn economic drag. Traditional recessions produce visible spikes in joblessness that trigger policy responses. Underemployment is far more insidious. The economy keeps functioning, but with weakened consumer confidence and reduced financial resilience beneath the surface. That makes it politically easier to ignore - and by the time economic strain becomes fully visible through spending slowdowns, debt pressures, or social instability, the underlying labour weakness is already deeply entrenched.

The psychological toll is real and underreported

In a 2025 survey by Resume Genius, 72% of US job seekers reported that the job-hunting process had negatively affected their mental health. And 44% of applicants cite never hearing back - after applying or even after interviewing - as their top frustration.

Many underemployed workers remain busy. Some work longer hours than before. But the psychological rewards associated with stable employment - identity, progression, a sense of security - all disappear. The experience of repeated, opaque rejection adds a particular kind of exhaustion that doesn't show up in any economic report.

A professional home for employer branding. The Institute of Employer Branding Professionals is being built and you can help shape it.

Find out more

Research confirms what most people intuitively understand: losing a job is associated with declines in psychological and physical wellbeing, social withdrawal, and long-term earnings losses. People who experience unemployment tend to find ways of making money that can fall as much as 50-90% when comparable workers who never lost theirs. That wage scarring is real, and it compounds over time.

The employer brand dimension

For employers, the rise of underemployment creates both opportunity and reputational risk.

Yes, larger available talent pools increase application volumes and reduce hiring leverage for candidates. But companies are increasingly being judged - by workers, by candidates, and by the broader public - on how they behave during periods of labour market imbalance.

Candidates remember ghosting. They remember excessively long hiring cycles and fake urgency. They remember applying to roles that were apparently never seriously open, or that attracted overwhelming volumes with no meaningful communication. Labour economist Nicole Bachaud puts it plainly: "The moment we're in right now in labour is stagnation across the board for workers and for employers."

In this environment, employer brands built entirely on optimism and culture messaging start to ring hollow. The old language of "limitless opportunity" is hard to sustain when a meaningful portion of your candidate pool is living through professional and financial instability.

This isn't a reason to abandon employer branding. But it is a reason to recalibrate it. Authenticity, transparency about process, and genuine respect for candidates' time are no longer nice-to-haves or givens. In a market where trust is eroding, they can become a competitive differentiator.

A measurement problem with real consequences

One of the largest risks in all of this is simply visibility.

Unemployment is measurable, widely tracked, and politically sensitive. Underemployment is diffuse. Definitions vary by country. Gig work muddies classifications. Many workers cycle between short contracts, self-employment, and part-time roles over short periods - never triggering any official count.

The result is that official statistics lag behind lived experience by many years. And the gap between what the numbers show and what people actually feel is becoming politically and socially significant in ways that are hard to ignore.

Low unemployment looked fine on paper in many countries right up until the moment that public sentiment turned sharply negative. There's a lesson in that.

What this actually is

There's a temptation to frame modern work as a story of flexibility and autonomy. For some workers, that's genuinely true. But there's a harder reality emerging underneath the headline numbers.

A growing share of workers appear economically active without feeling economically secure. They're working. They're busy. And many of them are struggling in ways that no official statistic is designed to capture.

Labour markets aren't only about whether people are working or not. They're about whether work provides stability, mobility, dignity, and a realistic path to sustain a life. Right now, for a lot of people, it doesn't. And the numbers we use to track labour market health weren't built to see it.

Takeaways

The unemployment rate is no longer a reliable measure of labour market health

Headline unemployment across developed economies sits at or near historic lows - around 4.9% across the OECD. But the way we define "employed" hasn't kept pace with how work has actually changed. A former senior manager piecing together freelance projects counts as employed. So does a corporate IT professional doing food deliveries between job applications. The statistic was built for a different era, and it's increasingly obscuring more than it reveals.

The competition for jobs has become structurally more brutal

In 2021, the average hire required around 100 applications. By 2024–2025, that number had tripled to over 300 - and the average job opening was attracting 242 applications, three times the 2017 figure. Meanwhile, job applications grew four times faster than actual openings in the first half of 2024. The market looks stable from the outside. For anyone actively searching, it feels nothing like that.

The gig economy's growth isn't all choice - a lot of it is necessity

The number of full-time independent workers in the US more than doubled between 2020 and 2024. Freelancing grew 90% in four years. Some of that reflects genuine preference for autonomy. But the context matters: 69% of employers who conducted layoffs in 2023–2024 then hired freelancers to fill the gaps. The work didn't disappear - it just got offloaded onto people with no benefits, no security, and no career path. Two thirds of freelancers say getting enough work is a consistent challenge.

The psychological cost is significant and almost entirely unmeasured

72% of US job seekers in 2025 said the job hunt had negatively affected their mental health. The average search now takes five months. Nearly a quarter of unemployed people have been out of work for 27 weeks or more. And ghosting - never hearing back after applying or interviewing - remains the single most cited frustration. This isn't just a wellbeing issue. It's an economic one: workers who experience unemployment typically re-enter the workforce earning 5–15% less than peers who never lost their jobs.

Underemployment creates an economic drag that's harder to see - and harder to fix

Traditional recessions produce visible spikes in joblessness that trigger policy responses. Underemployment spreads quietly. Consumer spending softens. Home purchases get delayed. Discretionary spending pulls back. Long-term financial commitments get postponed. The economy continues to function, but with weakened foundations underneath. By the time that weakness shows up in the data, it tends to already be entrenched and the policy window has narrowed.

Employer brand is being judged in this environment whether companies realise it or not

Candidates in a difficult market have long memories. Ghosting, performative job ads, hiring processes that drag on for months before going quiet - these experiences are forming lasting impressions of organisations right now. Brands that treat candidates well during a period of labour market imbalance will carry real goodwill into the next hiring cycle. Those that don't are building a reputational problem they may not see the full cost of until the market shifts again.