Nintendo Corrected Its Own Good News. BlackRock Normalized Its Bad News.

What Nintendo recently did

In late June, a mistranslated line from a shareholder Q&A turned into a viral headline: Nintendo had raised employee base salaries by 10 percent. Gaming outlets ran with it. Within days, Nintendo had to correct its own good news. That 10 percent increase happened in April 2023, not 2026. Nintendo president Shuntaro Furukawa had cited it, in Japanese, as one example of the company's ongoing approach to pay, and a machine-translated summary collapsed three years into one headline.

SPONSORED

Employer branding, measured. Fathom is the research and reputation platform for EB teams who want evidence, not instinct.

Visit fathom.inc

This is more significant than it sounds. A company chasing an employer-brand win does not correct a flattering, viral number downward. Nintendo did, via Kotaku, and then subtly confirmed something less dramatic but more telling. Furukawa told shareholders the company had “implemented further salary increases, including for starting salaries, in April 2026,” without disclosing the number. No round figure to put in a headline. Just another quiet raise, on top of the last one, that nobody would have written about on its own.

“Salaries form the foundation of our employees’ livelihoods; if pay were to fluctuate drastically based on business performance, it would be difficult for them to work with peace of mind. We believe that maintaining appropriate compensation levels is crucial to fostering an environment where employees can take on the challenge of creating new forms of entertainment without fear of failure.”Shuntaro Furukawa, Nintendo president, to shareholders, June 2026

This is no PR-washed culture-approved message. Nope. It's a healthy dose of good ol fashioned business logic: pay that does not swing with quarterly performance is what lets people take creative risks. Nintendo is not saying this to recruiters. It is saying it to shareholders, in a filing, as the explanation for why margins are not being squeezed on labor. Classy, selfless, and admirable.

The BlackRock contrast

On June 15, BlackRock cut roughly 200 jobs, its fourth reduction in 18 months, according to Bloomberg. Blackrock is not a company in distress - far from it. BlackRock manages $14 trillion in assets, just closed a $12 billion acquisition of HPS Investment Partners, and posted $268 billion in net inflows last quarter. The cuts even reached inside the HPS unit it had just spent $12 billion to acquire.

Employer branding works better when people share what they know. EBClub brings practitioners together to exchange ideas, compare experiences, and learn from the people doing the work.

Explore EBClub

A company spokesperson described the reductions to Bloomberg as “the ordinary discipline of a continuously evolving organization.” Worth being precise here: that phrase is BlackRock's corporate "approved" language, not a quote from Fink himself. But it describes the operating rhythm he has overseen since 2023: two 2025 rounds each cutting roughly 1 percent of headcount, then this one, per TheStreet's analysis, each one framed as routine maintenance rather than a response to any downturn. Four rounds in a year and a half, during a period the firm itself describes as record performance, is a little hard to square off.

Sure, a company is well within its rights to continually "rightsize" itself if it sees it fit. However, it has to understand there is a trust cost in doing so, especially if you say the following on your own careers site...

We are long-term thinkers, focused on helping people build a better tomorrow. We are deeply invested in the success of all of our stakeholders – our clients, our employees, our shareholders and the communities where we operate – and we run our business sustainably and responsibly.

The people we serve entrust us to help them prepare for the future. Our culture is defined by the deep sense of responsibility we feel to our clients and to each other.

At the companies we invest in for our clients, we advocate for sustainable and responsible business practices that drive long-term value.

Same weather, opposite bets

Strip away the industries and the two stories are running the same experiment. Neither company is under financial pressure. Both are performing well by their own numbers. Nintendo's Switch 2 has sold nearly 6 million units in the US in its first year. BlackRock just posted a record quarter for inflows. The variable is not whether there is enough money to go around. It is what each company decided its people were owed once the money showed up.

Nintendo's answer was to keep raising pay without needing the world to notice, and to let a flattering rumor get walked back to a less impressive truth rather than let it stand uncorrected. BlackRock's answer was to institutionalize layoffs as a recurring feature of being profitable, and to describe that as ordinary. Both are now on the record. Neither was forced into it.

Also on Blackrock's careers site is a message from their leader, it says...

Culture inspires employees to go above and beyond their responsibilities every day, to solve the most difficult problems, and to join together as One BlackRock to help people invest for retirement and achieve their most important financial goals.
Larry Fink, CEO, Blackrock

I wonder what culture he's referring to? Is it the one where everybody knows that rounds of layoffs are a feature, not a bug. And a responsibility to join together as One Blackrock seems, well, a little rich.

What the trust actually buys

This is the part employer brand teams tend to undersell internally. Trust is not built by a benefits page or a values slide (such as you'd see all over Blackrock's careers page). It is built by what a company does in the year nobody is asking it to prove anything, when performance is good and cutting costs or protecting margin would be the easy, defensible move either way.

SPONSORED

Helping HR, talent acquisition, employer branding, and company culture professionals find careers worth smiling about.

Find People-First Jobs Now

When employees watch a company protect pay and headcount during the good times, something practical happens: less energy goes into contingency planning for the next reorg, and more goes into the actual job. That has a funny habit of translating into engagement, discretionary effort, and lower voluntary attrition, the expensive kind, where the best people leave first because they have safer options. The inverse is just as measurable. A workforce that has watched “ordinary discipline” happen four times in 18 months does not need a memo to know what a strong quarter now means for them. It means nothing, or it means the next round is coming. Fear does not show up as a line item, but it shows up in how much of a person actually shows up.

None of this requires either company to be a villain or a saint. Nintendo has raised console and game prices. BlackRock's cuts are a rounding error against a 14-trillion-dollar balance sheet. But employer brand, reputation, and culture were never really about the press release. It is about the number a company is willing to corrected downward because the truth was better than the headline, or the latest round of layoffs a company no longer feels bothered to explain at all. Employees can tell the difference. And so can the next candidate deciding whether to believe the careers page.

Sources

Takeaways